The intelligence discipline we sell as a service exists as a product. Olvyen renders judgment on creative before money is spent.
A cockpit, not a dashboard.
Submit a creative asset. Name its platform and asset type. Olvyen returns a scored evaluation: a composite score, a verdict, the reasoning behind the score, and the specific fixes that would move it. It does not measure how an ad performed. It judges whether an ad should run at all.
Three independent evaluations. One judgment.
The user never sees three opinions. The evaluations are reconciled into a single composite score out of 100, built from six weighted dimensions that sum to 100.
One creative as Single, or several at once as Batch. Each carries a platform and an asset type.
Three independent evaluations run, then reconcile into one result.
A composite out of 100, from six weighted dimensions.
The composite resolves to one of four tiers.
Named, specific fixes. Not general advice.
A batch returns creatives ranked best to worst. What keeps budget, what gets cut.
“Move the offer above the fold. The current placement asks the viewer to scroll before the value is stated.”
Four tiers. Each one is a decision.
Do not spend. Structural failure.
Salvageable. Fix directives first.
Viable. Launch at controlled budget.
High conviction. Deploy with confidence.
Four surfaces.
Home
A readings screen. Total scores, average composite with a trailing thirty day delta, and the verdict spread across all four tiers.
Library
Every creative scored, in one place. Group into projects, filter by verdict or platform, move creatives between projects.
Brands
Saved brand context that scoring evaluates against.
Score
The submission surface. Single or Batch.
The same judgment, applied by hand.
Every creative is scored before it is deployed. That principle governs our AI and predictive intelligence engagements today, whether or not you use the product.